Fed Has Plenty Of Time To Decide

Error message

  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in _menu_load_objects() (line 579 of /var/www/drupal-7.x/includes/menu.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/drupal-7.x/includes/common.inc).
Published by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 25/01/2022 - 7:21am in

Tags 

central banks

The risk asset sell off has triggered a fair mount of “what does this mean for the Fed?” takes. Since this Brian Chappatta article on Bloomberg matched a lot of my views, I will keep these comments brief. One thing that I would like to emphasise: the Fed has a lot of time before the March meeting, which is the most plausible date for a first hike. Although risk assets have been hammered over the past few trading days, six weeks is an eternity in “market time.” If equities kept plunging for the next six weeks, that would imply a very severe bear market — which probably signals that something else is wrong in the financial system and/or economy.

  • On paper, the Fed has no reason to care about stock markets. This is not the case for the credit markets. Public equity markets are used by insiders as an exit strategy, very little capital is raised. Conversely, industrial capitalism runs on debt: both public market debt (bonds, securitisations) as well as private debt (private placements, bank debt). If the funding markets dry up, even solvent firms (i.e., positive equity value) can run into liquidity issues as they need to continuously roll over debt. Central banks have no choice but to act as a lender of last resort.
  • Bank equities are probably the most obvious candidate to watch for such stresses.
  • One might easily be more cynical about Fed personnel’s attitude towards equities. American elites are obsessed with the stock market, and central bankers are part of the elite. This was probably more of an issue during the Greenspan Fed era, as there was greater confidence in the equity market being a leading indicator for the economy, as well as strong beliefs in the importance of the “wealth effect.”
  • A rout in energy prices will knock a big hole in headline inflation, which will feed into “inflation expectations” for many individuals. That reduces the urgency to hike.
  • Crypto blowing up is not only hilarious, it might reduce the demand for high end chips. This in turn could reduce some of the knock-on supply chain problems. Otherwise, the collapse of crypto and tech darlings is a non-issue for central bankers.

Although I respect the idea that some levered players are being liquidated in the “tech” area, expecting another six weeks of weak equities is quite a hurdle to jump. Luckily for me, I do not give investment advice, so forecasting whether that happens is not my problem.

Email subscription: Go to https://bondeconomics.substack.com/ 
(c) Brian Romanchuk 2022