Error message

Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in _menu_load_objects() (line 579 of /var/www/drupal-7.x/includes/

Sunday, 30 August 2020 - 2:21pm

Published by Matthew Davidson on Sun, 30/08/2020 - 2:21pm in

This week, I have been mostly reading these comics:

Sunday, 23 August 2020 - 5:36pm

Published by Matthew Davidson on Sun, 23/08/2020 - 5:36pm in

This week, I have been mostly reading:

Sunday, 16 August 2020 - 5:17pm

Published by Matthew Davidson on Sun, 16/08/2020 - 5:17pm in

This fortnight, I have been mostly reading:

Sunday, 26 July 2020 - 4:07pm

Published by Matthew Davidson on Sun, 26/07/2020 - 4:07pm in

This week, I have been mostly reading:

Sunday, 12 July 2020 - 4:23pm

Published by Matthew Davidson on Sun, 12/07/2020 - 4:23pm in

This week fortnight, I have been mostly reading:

Sunday, 5 July 2020 - 4:24pm

Published by Matthew Davidson on Sun, 05/07/2020 - 4:24pm in

This week, I have been mostly reading:

A Blog Reading List

Published by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/07/2020 - 11:50pm in

Today I’m sharing a list of blogs that I read frequently. Although I’m ostensibly a political economist, only two of the five blogs below are about economics. The other three are about physics. These physics blogs, however, are interesting because of the sociological aspects of science that they explore. So even if you’re not interested in cosmology or particle physics, it’s worth checking out what these physicists have to say. I think you’ll find that the problems they identify are shared by all areas of science.

1. Backreaction

Written by the German physicist Sabine Hossenfelder, Backreaction explores ideas in physics as well as general problems in science. Hossenfelder started the blog in 2006, back when blogs were more like diaries (web logs). But over time, she’s turned Backreaction into one of the most-read blogs about physics.

In 2018, Hossenfelder wrote a book called Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. She explores how the idea that theories should be ‘beautiful’ has led physicists into a scientific dead end. It’s a well-written book whose humorous tone belies its important message.

Hossenfelder explores many of the same issues on her blog. She has recently transitioned into video blogging, but her written blog remains home base. You can watch her videos on youtube and read the transcript on Backreaction. I always find her commentary informative, even when I don’t agree with her conclusions.

On a personal note, I respect Hossenfelder because she’s sacrificed her career to speak out about problems in physics. Although a veteran scientist, Hossenfelder hasn’t yet landed a tenured position. She’s put that ideals of science above careerism. I wish more scientists had the courage to do so.

2. Triton Station

Written by American astrophysicist Stacy McGaugh, Triton Station is a blog about the science and sociology of cosmology. I read Triton Station for two reasons. First, I love cosmology. There’s nothing that dispels human myopia quite like staring into the immensity of the cosmos. Second, McGaugh explores sociological issues that are common to all branches of science.

Permit me a brief foray into physics and cosmology. Our theory of gravity, you were probably taught, is among our most secure knowledge. Newton’s law of gravitation has been verified to exquisite precision within the solar system. And no experiment has ever contracted general relativity — Einstein’s theory of gravity. These theories, you probably learned, are overwhelmingly supported by evidence.

The problem is that this assertion is simply false. Everywhere we look in the cosmos, Newton’s theory of gravity fails. Pick any of the 100-billion known galaxies and watch the movement of stars. Inevitably, you’ll find that the stars move too fast to be bound by the matter we see. According to Newton’s laws, these galaxies shouldn’t exist — they should have long ago flown apart. And yet there they sit, happily disobeying the laws of gravity.

Our theory of gravity, then, is awash with evidence that contradicts it. This suggests that something is deeply wrong — that we need a new theory of gravity. What’s troubling, McGaugh observes, is that the vast majority of cosmologists don’t interpret the evidence this way. Instead, they assume that our theory of gravity is correct. The fact that stars move too quickly is then interpreted not as a contradicting Newton’s theory, but as evidence for a hidden form of matter — dark matter.

What is fascinating from a sociological perspective (and what is applicable in all areas of science) is the degree to which cosmologists are unaware of their underlying assumptions. McGaugh explores these issues vividly and lucidly. But more than being a good writer and philosopher of science, McGaugh is a great scientist. He’s done ground-breaking work exploring the motion of stars in galaxies. He’s shown that an alternative theory of gravity (called ‘modified Newtonian dynamics’) predicts almost all of the behavior that is observed in galaxies.

As with Hossenfelder, the sociological issues that McGaugh explores are applicable in all areas of science. When reading about dark matter, for instance, I’m reminded of economists’ concept of ‘technological progress’. The neoclassical theory of economic growth fails everywhere that it’s applied. The growth of capital and labor cannot (as the theory once predicted) account for the growth of real GDP. But neoclassical economists are undeterred. They turn this failed prediction into the ‘discovery’ of ‘technological progress’. In cosmology, scientists insert ‘dark matter’ wherever it’s needed to retain their theory of gravity. Similarly, economists insert ‘technological progress’ wherever it’s needed to retain their theory of economic growth.

If you’re interested in the universe, you should read Triton Station. And even if you’re not a cosmology junky, read Triton Station to understand the sociology of science.

3. Steve Keen’s Blog

Steve Keen is an Australian economist famous for his book Debunking Economics — an epic take down of neoclassical economics. Keen formerly blogged at Debt Deflation, but has since moved to Patreon.

What I like about Keen’s work is its eclecticism. He writes about monetary issues (the dynamics of credit), about the role of energy in the economy, and about the economics of climate change. It’s this last topic that I think is most important. Every few years, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change writes a report that assesses the state of climate-change science. Included is a report about the economic impact of climate change. The average reader probably thinks that this economic-impact report is hard-nosed science, taking full account of the physical basis of our economy. But it’s not. The report is written largely by neoclassical economists who grossly misunderstand the threat posed by climate change.

Keen has recently devoted much of his time to debunking this fraudulent economics of climate change. His writing is accessible to the lay reader, but the analysis is anything but superficial. Keen brings to light the bizarre assumptions that are hidden deep inside the neoclassical sausage. It should be required reading for anyone who is concerned about sustainability.

4. Not Even Wrong

Written by physicist/mathematician Peter Woit, Not Even Wrong is a blog about problems in physics. Woit became famous for his book of the same name, which was among the first to criticize the path taken by modern physics (with its fixation on esoteric, but untestable, theories like string theory).

Woit has been blogging since 2004, so there’s an enormous archive to discover. His writing ranges from technical commentary on aspects of physics, to more general discussion about the sociology of science. It’s the latter that I find the most interesting. The blog’s name stems from a comment attributed to physicist Wofgang Pauli. The worst theories, Pauli observed, aren’t wrong. They’re ‘not even wrong‘. They can’t even be tested.

As a social scientist, I’ve come to believe that many of our social-science theories are ‘not even wrong’. They simply cannot be tested. Marginal utility theory springs to mind. It’s a theory that purports to explain all aspects of human behavior — an expansiveness that has seduced many economists. The problem is that this expansiveness occurs because the theory actually makes no falsifiable predictions. It’s impossible to show that someone is not maximizing their utility. Marginal productivity theory is not even wrong.

I read Woit’s blog with one eye on physics and one eye on the social sciences. True, he’s talking about problems in the foundations of physics. But the sociological issues he identifies are applicable to all branches of science. When one school of thought gets entrenched, alternative ideas are suppressed. In physics, the dominant school goes by the name of ‘string theory’. In political economy, it’s ‘neoclassical economics’. But the groupthink behaviors are remarkably similar.

5. Notes on the Crises

Written by economist Nathan Tankus, Notes on the Crises dives into the financial mechanics that underly governments’ reaction to the COVID pandemic. Tankus is a lucid writer, making what might otherwise be arcane details spring to life.

Reading Tankus’ analysis, you’ll probably assume that he’s a PhD-trained economist. But he’s not. In fact, he has yet to finish an undergraduate degree. Tankus’ story reminds me of Freeman Dyson — one of the great physicists of the 20th century. While Dyson made important contributions to fundamental physics, he never completed a PhD. In fact, for his whole life he was a vocal critic of the PhD system.

There is a certain freshness that comes from not being bogged down by a graduate education. Writing clearly about science involves, in many ways, forgetting what you learned to do in grad school. Out with the obtuse literature review. In with the incisive commentary. Tankus has the knowledge of a PhD-trained academic, but without the accompanying hubris and scholastic baggage. If you want to understand the economics of the COVID pandemic, read Notes on the Crises.

What are you reading?

These are the blogs that I read frequently. There are many others not mentioned that I read occasionally. I’d like to hear what blogs you read. Leave a comment with your own blog list.

Support this blog

Economics from the Top Down is where I share my ideas for how to create a better economics. If you liked this post, consider becoming a patron. You’ll help me continue my research, and continue to share it with readers like you.


Stay updated

Sign up to get email updates from this blog.

Keep me up to date

Sunday, 28 June 2020 - 1:43pm

Published by Matthew Davidson on Sun, 28/06/2020 - 1:43pm in

This week, I have been mostly reading:

Sunday, 21 June 2020 - 4:49pm

Published by Matthew Davidson on Sun, 21/06/2020 - 4:49pm in

This fortnight, I have been mostly reading:

Do The Work

Published by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 09/06/2020 - 10:03pm in


race, reading

As protests continue to roll around the globe in response to the unjust murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and many other People of Color, many of us are trying to identify meaningful ways to enact real change. These events demonstrate the ongoing patterns of systemic and institutionalized racism that impact African Americans and other people of color across every aspect of society. These raise significant questions about equity, access, and justice from housing, to employment, to health care, and education. To address these challenges, we are creating a learning community to support individuals as they become allies, and then eventually advocates for anti-racist work.

As we individually and collectively examine these questions, we must first examine our own perspectives, privileges, and identity. We are watching Americans wake up to the centuries of injustice and dehumanization of others that do not share the same experiences. To ensure that we don’t fall back to sleep in a state of complacency, we need to prepare for when the protests, social media buzz, and hashtags fade. In short, we need to do the work.

We are a small group of volunteers who met as members of the Higher Ed Learning Collective. We were inspired by the initial demand, and the idea of self-study, interracial groups. The initial decision to form this initiative is based on the myriad calls from people of color for white-bodied people to do internal work. To do the work, we are developing a space for all individuals to read, share, discuss, and interrogate perspectives on race, racism, anti-racism, identity in an educational setting. To ensure that the fight continues for justice, we need to participate in our own ongoing reflection of self and biases. We need to examine ourselves, ask questions, and learn to examine our own perspectives. We need to get uncomfortable in asking ourselves tough questions, with an understanding that this is a lifelong, ongoing process of learning.

The purpose of these reading and discussion groups are to strive to understand the history of pervasive structural and systemic racism in America, and how this impacts the present, the future, and ourselves. We intend to create safe, brave spaces to facilitate discussions as we co-investigate anti-racist texts and their role in our individual and collective contexts. You can participate with the groups even if you don’t want to collaborate and co-investigate. We’d like to leave the door open for those that just need the extra push to read these books and question themselves.

Please understand that we are not identifying or positioning ourselves as the experts. To the contrary, we are individuals, just like those reading this, that want to question and reflect on ourselves, seeking to do the work to promote real change. We encourage you to join as co-facilitators, participants, or just to listen. The facilitators are volunteers that are part of the whole, not in charge of the whole. You need to decide your approach point as you interact with these texts, as guided by the purpose of this group. 

All are welcome to join and begin, or continue, their own racial identity journey. Each book study group will be at a different place on the continuum, with different books focusing on different topics. We hope to include options that allow anyone to participate based on where they are at in this process. At least one book will focus on White privilege, while others will focus more on bias, perspective, and social justice. We are hoping to provide space for anyone interested in doing this work.

Choose your level

In order to facilitate growth for individuals as they become allies, and then eventually advocates for anti-racist work we will create three reading groups as guided by this model from Anna Stamborski, Nikki Zimmermann, and Bailie Gregory. The reading groups will operate contemporaneously and autonomously for 8 weeks. We will begin on June 15th, 2020, and conclude the groups on August 15, 2020. Each group will hold their own meetings, and decide on the goals and objectives of the learning collective.

Please review the following three groups and review some of the materials included to decide where you might fit best. You’re welcome to join at a lower ‘level’ than you may feel you’re currently at. We believe there is value to building a solid foundation, regardless of prior reading, knowledge, or experience.

Level One – Starting the Work

These are the types of texts you might consume at this level: 

Level Two: Owning the Work

These are the types of texts you might consume at this level: 

Level Three: Moving from Ally to Advocate

These are the types of texts you might consume at this level: 

Join us

You can then use the form below to indicate the group you’d like to join. Group facilitators will reach out to organize the individual groups and identify the next steps. Please Note, we have stopped accepting new members for the Summer 2020 group. 

We will keep your information private and only share with the group facilitators. You will have an opportunity to introduce yourself to your learning community in the next stage.

Brought to you by an initial group of facilitators

Alexia Buono

Danielle Dennis

Cheryl Hendry

Lynda Keller

Judson Laughter

Will McCorkle

Joaquin A. B. Munoz

Liz Norell

Ian O’Byrne

Rachelle Savitz

Katarina N. Silvestri

The post Do The Work first appeared on W. Ian O'Byrne.