For those of you who remember the embarrassment of the Times coverage of the “Whitewater” scandal, it must seem like déjà vu all over again. It does to me. The paper’s editors are trying, and I mean really trying, to make the Biden classified documents issue a thing. And I mean a grave thing. The stage was ably set by the subject line of the email I received blasting out their latest deep dive on the story: “Inside Biden’s 68 days of silence.” It’s this like a Gabriel García Márquez homage? I mean good lord. Are we really doing this again? Of course we are. It’s how they roll. I took the liberty of a short set of annotations. That’s from Josh Marshall who does an excellent job of analyzing the rapidly escalating hysteria around Joe Biden’s classified documents. I, of course, remember Whitewater as I’m sure quite a few of you do too. What both Josh and I recognize is the febrile excitement and barely repressed, palpable glee among the press corps as they run with the story 24/7 despite the fact that there is no real “news” beyond the fact that some classified documents were found and a special prosecutor has been named in order that the DOJ not be criticized for being biased against Trump for naming one in a very different case. That’s it. The “story” you see is 100% about the negative political implications for Joe Biden not the substance of the supposed crime. After…