JonathanTurley.com
"Objectivity Has Got To Go": News Leaders Call For End Of Objective Journalism
Jonathan Turley | Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
The term “late capitalism” seems to be everywhere as a trending meme – often used as a kind of shorthand to illustrate the absurdities of certain free market economies. On Twitter, you will find the hashtags #latecapitalism (English), #tardocapitalismo (Italian), #capitalismotardio (Spanish), and #spätkapitalismus (German), among others. Typically, they satirise notions such as the idea of endless growth. The term also pops up in a wide range of academic articles and books. There are, for instance, discussions around the populist rise in late capitalism, the increase in financial-related investments in late capitalism, migration conditions in late capitalism, and so on. But what are the origins of this term? And what, exactly, does it mean?
The post We live in a time of ‘late capitalism’. But what does that mean? appeared first on Progress in Political Economy (PPE).
“Marie Kondo admits she has ‘kind of given up’ on extreme tidiness, [and] says her house ‘is messy’ … The organization guru, who popularized decluttering as a means to ‘spark joy,’ has changed her ways after welcoming her third child.” — People.com
To my mind, issuing consols as JP Koning suggests is the simple solution and to be preferred over the coin, which has no precedent and appears gimmicky. In addition, he points out that consols fir with existing Fed policy and operations whereas the coin does not.
However, my preferred solution would be for the president to order the treasury secretary to ignore the debt ceiling as contradicting previous legislation without repealing it. Then there is also the Fourteenth Amendment.
Short and worth a read in full.
MoneynessOn the passing away of Luigi Pasinetti
Everyone at INET is deeply saddened to learn that Luigi Pasinetti has passed away. Professor Pasinetti was both a great economist and a friend of INET. His life and works are instructive at many levels, not least because, along with the very similar case of Joan Robinson, they highlight the rank partisanship of the Nobel Prize committee in economics. But that is a discussion for another day. For now, INET wants to express its heartfelt condolences to Professor Pasinetti’s wife Carmela and his family.
INET produced an extended video series with Dr. Pasinetti some years ago.
We also published an outstanding introduction to much of his work by Professor Joseph Halevi.
Hovertext:
Wow, you have huge biceps from your constant muscle tension!
So the IMF has come late to the transitory inflation party. What was obvious months ago is now at the forefront of IMF forecasts. Better late than never I suppose. It is becoming clear that most indicators are still not predicting a major demand-side collapse in most nations. Growth has moderated slightly and the forward indicators are looking up. At the same time, the inflation data around the world is suggesting the price pressures have peaked and lower inflation rates are expected. Real wages continue to fall, which means that the inflationary pressures were not being driven by wages. So no wage-price spiral mechanism at play. And PMI data and related indicators (such as shipping costs, etc) suggest the supply constraints which drove the inflationary pressures are easing. So has all this been the work of the interest rate rises imposed on nations by central bankers (bar Japan)? Not likely. The rising interest rates and falling inflation are coincidental rather than causal. Which means the damage to low income debt holders and the bank profits boom from the higher rates was for what?...