- by Steve Nadis & Shing-Tung Yau
Reading
When we want to change the world we’re usually reacting to a problem. Even positive visions usually come out of negatives. We want liberty because we have tyranny. We want health because we have sickness. We want prosperity because we have poverty. We want equality because some people have way more than they need and others less than need.
When we solve a problem it’s generally mediated by a principle. Very often the principle is just the problem stated slightly differently.
Problem: Some people have more than they need, others have less than they need.
Principle: Make sure no one has more than they need while anybody has less than they need.
A principle tells you, generally speaking, what you should be doing about a problem. It doesn’t tell you how to do it.
So, for the example above, post-war Welfare states generally came upon the solution:
Alexander Graham Bell reflects on the very first telephone call in a letter to his father.
The post “This Is a Great Day with Me” appeared first on Nautilus.
A tale of ecological salvation in Mexico.
The post Ranchers, Cattle, Tequila, and Bats appeared first on Nautilus.
Both of us are researchers who are deeply influenced by the work of French philosopher Louis Althusser. Responsible in large part for a vigorous approach to Marxism in the 1960s and 1970s (dubbed “structural Marxism”), Althusser the scholar was always controversial.
The post Althusser, “levels” and a scholarly dialogue appeared first on Progress in Political Economy (PPE).
Volunteers raised funds for a new ambulance in Lebanon’s south. Israel quickly destroyed it in an airstrike — killing five emergency workers.
The post Israel Escalates Attacks on Lebanese First Responders — Potentially a War Crime appeared first on The Intercept.