Reading
Featuring articles by James B. Thomson and Walker F. Todd, Claudia Sahm, Gerald Epstein, Ronnie J. Phillips, Anastasia Nesvetailova, Gerald P. O’Driscoll, Jr., William Bergman, and Thomas Ferguson
After a bitter and bruising election contest, Humza Yousaf has won the Scottish National Party’s (SNP) leadership and become Scotland’s First Minister. His victory over his nearest rival, Kate Forbes, was far from convincing. Yousaf won 48.2 percent first preference votes to Forbes’ 40.7 percent. As neither candidate gained over 50 percent, the second preferences […]
There is a banking crisis. Again. Banking regulators were asleep at the switch. Again.
The present crisis is not a replay of 2007-08, which was centered around housing. In that crisis, lenders took on too much credit risk. Additionally, financial institutions relied on exotic financial products to protects, such as derivatives, to protect against risk. The products failed to do so. Lawmakers and regulators reacted by placing new constraints on credit risk.
Thomas Hoenig, former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and former Vice-Chairman of the FDIC, argues that “Another Banking Crisis was Predictable.” In response to the last banking crisis, the Fed’s risk models were focused on credit risk, while Silicon Valley Bank’s portfolio was heavily exposed to interest-rate (“duration”) risk. Once the Fed began hiking interest rates, the value of SVBs assets began falling.
A federal government guarantee or 100% reserve banking? Which is better?
Not long after arriving to teach economics at Colorado State University nearly four decades ago, I was introduced to a retired economist living in Fort Collins who had a simple idea for solving the problem of bank runs: require banks to have the cash on hand whenever the depositor wished to withdraw. Lloyd W. Mints had been one of the founders of the Chicago School of Economics along with Henry Simons and Frank Knight. The proposal, which has a history going back to at least the early 19th century, has variously been called 100% reserves, full reserve banking, or the Chicago Plan for Banking Reform.
Bank failures don't threaten most deposits, but they do threaten jobs
At the last FOMC press conference, Fed Chair Jay Powell assured us that “all depositors' savings and the banking system are safe.” The failure of Silicon Valley Bank less than two weeks earlier had started a debate about whose deposits were safe. Specifically, whether deposits greater than $250,000, which are not FDIC insured, would be protected like the smaller, insured deposits. In the end, Silicon Valley and Signature Bank, which also failed, were deemed systemic risks, so all depositors received their money.
The explanation of systematic breakdowns in supervisory oversight over time must include the shift in Federal Reserve culture during and after the 1990s
The closing of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on March 17 began a series of extraordinary steps taken by key supervisors of the global financial system (United States, United Kingdom, and Switzerland), all of which tell us that we are not living in normal times. From the US Treasury’s approval of a “systemic risk exception” for SVB, thus allowing a blanket government guarantee of all its deposits, to the precedent-setting rescue of all deposits at Credit Suisse, ordinary understandings of the law were stretched to and probably beyond their limits.
“A divided House on Friday approved legislation that would mandate that schools make library catalogs and curriculums public, and that they obtain parental consent before honoring a student’s request to change their gender-identifying pronouns, part of a Republican effort to wring political advantage from a raging debate over contentious social issues.” — New York Times
I support the passage of the Parents Bill of Rights because I believe every parent should have the right to be involved in their child’s school, whether through censoring curriculum, banning books, or blocking kids from choosing their own pronouns.
Austerity for ordinary citizens and bank rescues for the affluent is a toxic mix
Not even ChatGPT could dream this up: Fifteen years after the whole world financial system collapsed and barely a decade since we were told the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill fixed the problems in the US system, two major regional banks in the U.S. are down and depositors are fleeing from many, many more.