Look, this is not up for debate. We’re going to keep feeding the grizzly bear.
Sure, he may not protect us in any tangible sense. In fact, sometimes he hurts us. But that’s just how the cookie crumbles.
The thing is, the grizzly bear has always been there. We’ve always been feeding him, and there really is no good reason to stop doing that.
Oh, he’s getting increasingly violent? He keeps attacking strangers for no discernible reason? First of all, I don’t know about that. Second of all, that’s not our problem. What the bear does after we feed him has nothing to do with us. That’s his business.
“Feeding the grizzly bear is so expensive,” you say. “That money could be put toward all sorts of better causes.”
Listen, a budget is a budget, and it can’t be changed. Unless we want to devote more money to feeding the grizzly bear, in which case the budget must be changed.



